Sunday, June 25, 2006

Appellate Court Strikes Hedge Fund Registration Rule

The United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has stricken the SEC's rule which required the registration of hedge fund managers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The rule, which was ill concieved and premised upon questionable factual findings, caused approximately 1,000 hedge fund managers to register under the Act.

The ruling now throws into question those registrations, and managers are going to have to decide whether to withdraw their registrations, or to remain registered pending an SEC response to the ruling.

Friday, June 23, 2006

Of Politics, Regulation and Hedge Funds

The NYTimes has a piece titled S.E.C. Is Reported to Be Examining a Big Hedge Fund which addresses an alleged investigation by the SEC into the trades of Pequot Capital Management,a $7 billion fund overseen by Arthur J. Samberg. However, the article is really about a fired SEC attorney who claims that the Commission terminated his employment during the course of his investigation of Pequot. One of his allegations is that he was fired because he wanted to subpoena John Mack, the chief executive of Morgan Stanley.

Friday, June 16, 2006

Quattrone Overview

Ann Woolner at Bloomberg.com has an interesting analysis of the Quattrone legal battles

Monday, June 12, 2006

Option Investigations Continue to Expand

The Associated Press is reporting that the parent of job search site Monster.com was subpoenaed on Monday by the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York over the timing of stock options grants to executives.

This investigation, being conducted by multiple agencies, is increasingly causing concern. While the mere fact that documents have been requested means nothing, and in reality a criminal investigation also means nothing, there are certainly a significant number of companies who are involved.

While it may well turn out that these firms did not backdate options, and that the pricing and issuance of options was properly reviewed and approved by attorneys and accountants, these multiple investigations cannot be good for the shareholders of these companies, or the markets as a whole.

Sunday, June 11, 2006

In Switch, Company Sues NASD For Fraud, Says NASD Aided FBI In Creating Bogus B/D

In Switch, Company Sues NASD For Fraud, Says NASD Aided FBI In Creating Bogus B/D: "In an unlikely lawsuit, a private company is suing the NASD for securities fraud. A small cancer-research firm called Shimoda-Atlantic, based in Bentonville, Arkansas, filed a lawsuit against the NASD on Wednesday because, the company says, the self-regulatory organization helped several men, allegedly employed by the FBI, to create and perpetrate a fraudulent securities scheme against the company "

Tuesday, June 6, 2006

Alito - Scalia Clash

When Justice Alito was confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice, most observers (on both sides of the aisle) assumed/feared/hoped/expected that Justice Alito would join Justice Scalia and move the Court in a more conservative direction. We maybe seeing the start of another example of the dangers of expecting too much from judicial appointees.

Law.com's article, linked above, discusses an small, but perhaps important, rift between the two Justices, with Justice Scalia refusing to join in an opinion written by Justice Alito because of the use of legislative history in the opinion, which Justice Scalia does not believe is an appropriate source for interpreting a statute.

As pointed out by Law.com, Alito could have easily appeased Justice Scalia and simply deleted the paragraph that Justice Scalia found so offensive, and there would not have been a concurring opinion. But Justice Alito chose to keep the paragraph, and the public rift between the two Justices.

Not earth shattering, and perhaps not significant, but it is always good to see the new kid on the team flex his muscle a bit.

Friday, June 2, 2006

NASD Dismisses Quattrone Case

Frank Quattrone, the former Credit Suisse Group technology banker, who handled some of the hottest Internet deals, said the NASD dropped its case accusing him of improperly awarding shares in initial public offerings during the Internet boom.

The end of the NASD cases eliminates the remaining legal barrier for a return to the securities industry by Quattrone, who was paid $120 million in 2000 as the top banker promoting Internet stocks. According to Bloomberg, Quattrone will not re-enter the business.

Thursday, June 1, 2006

Feds - NYC Has No National Icons to Protect

In connection with the 40% cut in funds to New York City for homeland security, the federal government apparently feels that New York City is not a prime terrorist threat, finding that the city had just four major financial assets at risk, and no national monuments or icons.

Financial capital of the world, the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange, the Federal Reserve, (heck, the entire Wall Street area), the Empire State Building, the Chrysler Building, Yankee Stadium, the United Nations, Ellis Island, the Staute of Liberty.

No national icons in New York City?