Thursday, February 27, 2014

Arizona-Based Private Equity Fund Manager Charged in Expense Misallocation Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against an Arizona-based private equity fund manager and his investment advisory firm for orchestrating a scheme to misallocate their expenses to the funds they manage.

The SEC Enforcement Division alleges that Scott A. Brittenham and Clean Energy Capital LLC (CEC) improperly paid more than $3 million of the firm's expenses by using assets from 19 private equity funds that invest in private ethanol production plants. CEC and Brittenham did not disclose any such payment arrangement in fund offering documents. When the funds ran out of cash to pay the firm's expenses, CEC and Brittenham loaned money to the funds at unfavorable interest rates and unilaterally changed how they calculated investor returns to benefit themselves.

"Brittenham betrayed investors in the funds he managed by burdening them with more than $3 million in expenses that his firm should have paid and the funds could not afford," said Marshall S. Sprung, co-chief of the SEC Enforcement Division's Asset Management Unit. "Private equity advisers can only charge expenses to their funds when they clearly spell that out for investors."

According to the SEC's order instituting administrative proceedings, among the expenses that CEC and Brittenham have been misallocating to the funds are CEC's rent, salaries, and other employee benefits such as tuition costs, retirement, and bonuses. Brittenham even used fund assets to pay 70 percent of a $100,000 bonus that he awarded himself. The money taken from the funds for firm expenses was in addition to millions of dollars in management fees already being paid to CEC out of the funds.

According to the SEC's order, the expense misallocation scheme shrank the funds' cash reserves. So CEC and Brittenham made unauthorized "loans" to the funds at exorbitant rates as high as 17 percent in order to continue paying the improper expenses with fund assets. The loans jeopardized the funds because Brittenham had pledged fund assets as collateral. CEC and Brittenham further profited at the expense of fund investors by making several changes to how CEC calculated distributions to investors in order to pay out less money. Brittenham also lied to a fund investor about his "skin in the game." Brittenham claimed that he and CEC's co-founder had each invested $100,000 of their own money in one of the funds, but the actual amounts invested were only $25,000 each.

The SEC's order alleges that CEC and Brittenham willfully violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and also asserts disclosure, compliance, custody, and reporting violations.

The SEC's investigation was conducted by Payam Danialypour and C. Dabney O'Riordan of the Asset Management Unit in the Los Angeles Regional Office and accountant Deborah Russell in Washington D.C. The SEC's litigation will be led by Amy Longo, Lynn Dean, and Mr. Danialypour. The SEC examination that led to the investigation was conducted by Ryan Hinson, Ernest Tang, Daniel Jung, and Thomas Mackin of the Los Angeles office's investment adviser/investment company examination program.


Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

10 Countries Sitting on Mounds of Gold

10 Countries Sitting On Ginormous Mounds Of Gold 

Goldman Poaches BofA Leveraged Finance Honcho Murphy

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2014/02/25/goldman-poaches-bofa-leveraged-finance-honcho-murphy

Credit Suisse CEO fights back on tax evasion claims

Credit Suisse CEO fights back on tax evasion claims - http://pulse.me/s/RYmCy

Wall Street Investment Banker With Insider Trading in Former Girlfriend's Account to Pay Child Support.

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed an emergency action against a New York City-based investment banker charged with insider trading for nearly $1 million in illicit profits.

SECThe SEC alleges that while working on Wall Street, Frank “Perk” Hixon Jr. regularly logged into the brokerage account of Destiny “Nicole” Robinson, the mother of his young child.  He executed trades based on confidential information he obtained on the job, sometimes within minutes of learning it.  Illegal trades also were made in his father’s brokerage account.  When his firm confronted him about the trading conducted in these accounts, Hixon Jr. pretended not to recognize the names of his father or his child’s mother.  However, text messages between Hixon Jr. and Robinson suggest he was generating the illegal proceeds in lieu of formal child support payments.

In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York today announced criminal charges against Hixon Jr.
“Hixon Jr. violated the trust of his employer and clients by abusing his special access to nonpublic market-moving information,” said David Woodcock, director of the SEC’s Fort Worth Regional Office.  “Hixon Jr. went to great lengths to hide his wrongdoing and even denied knowing his father or the mother of his child.”
A federal judge has granted the SEC’s request and issued an emergency order freezing Robinson’s brokerage account, which the SEC alleges contains the majority of proceeds from Hixon Jr.’s illegal trading with a balance of approximately $1.2 million. 
According to the SEC’s complaint unsealed today in federal court in Austin, Texas, Hixon Jr. illegally tipped or traded in the securities of three public companies.  He traded ahead of several major announcements by his client Westway Group in 2011 and 2012.  He traded based on nonpublic information he learned about potential client Titanium Metals Corporation ahead of its merger announcement in November 2012.  And Hixon even illegally traded in the securities of his own firm Evercore Partners prior to its announcement of record earnings in January 2013.  Hixon Jr. generated illegal insider trading profits of at least $950,000. 
According to the SEC’s complaint, when Hixon Jr.’s employer asked him in 2013 whether he knew anything about suspicious trading in accounts belonging to Destiny Robinson and his father Frank P. Hixon Sr., who lives in suburban Atlanta, Hixon Jr. denied recognizing either name.  When later confronted with information that he did in fact know these individuals, Hixon Jr. continued his false claims, saying he didn’t know Robinson as “Destiny” and asserting in a sworn declaration that when approached he didn’t recognize the name of the city where his father lived for more than 25 years.  Hixon Jr. was subsequently terminated by his employer.
The SEC’s complaint alleges that Hixon Jr. violated the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  In addition to the asset freeze, the complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and financial penalties.  Hixon Sr. and Robinson have been named as relief defendants for the purposes of recovering the illegal trading profits held in their accounts.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Two Hong Kong-Based Firms to Pay $11 Million for Insider Trading Ahead of Nexen Acquisition by Company in China

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that two Hong Kong-based asset management firms whose accounts were frozen in a major insider trading case have agreed to pay nearly $11 million to settle the charges against them.

The SEC obtained an emergency asset freeze in July 2012 against unknown traders just days after the announcement that China-based CNOOC Ltd. had agreed to acquire Canadian energy company Nexen Inc., causing more than a 50 percent spike in the price of Nexen shares. The SEC filed the emergency action after discovering that traders using brokerage accounts in Hong Kong and Singapore stood to make more than $13 million in potentially illicit profits.

Combined with earlier settlements in the case, the SEC has now obtained nearly $30 million in ill-gotten gains plus financial penalties from foreign traders who purchased Nexen stock while in possession of nonpublic information about the pending acquisition.

"The SEC's swift action in this case ensured that traders located on the other side of the globe were not only deprived of their illegal insider trading profits but eventually paid steep penalties," said Sanjay Wadhwa, senior associate director for enforcement in the SEC's New York Regional Office. "Our efforts have recouped nearly $30 million and sent a strong deterrent message that insider trading in the U.S. even if carried out from overseas simply doesn't pay."

CITIC Securities International Investment Management (HK) Limited and China Shenghai Investment Management Limited agreed to pay $6.6 million and $4.3 million respectively. These two firms managed the last remaining frozen accounts in the case. Once SEC investigators located the suspicious accounts and froze their assets, they worked with foreign regulators and carefully scrutinized the trading records to identify the traders, setting the stage for a string of settlements by firms and individuals:

  • A Chinese businessman, his private investment company, and his wife and her brokerage customers agreed to a $3.3 million settlement in March 2013. 

The settlement with China Shenghai, approved earlier today by Judge Richard J. Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, requires disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains totaling $4,268,057.16 by the firm and eight clients on whose behalf Nexen stock trades were made in the week leading up to the public announcement: Biggain Holdings Limited, Classictime Investments Limited, Feng Hai Yan, Gao Mei, Sparky International Trade Co., Stephen Wang Sang Wong, Zhang Jing Wei, and Zheng Rong. They neither admitted nor denied the allegations.

The settlement with CITIC Securities, approved by the court in late January, requires the firm to pay $3,299,596.84 in disgorgement and a $3,299,596.84 penalty for purchasing shares of Nexen stock in the U.S. for the accounts of two of its affiliates. The firm neither admitted nor denied the allegations. The disgorgement amount represents the total profits that the firm and its affiliates obtained. The SEC acknowledges the cooperation of CITIC Securities and its parent company CITIC Securities International Company Limited in the investigation.

Monday, February 3, 2014

Scottrade Agrees to Pay $2.5 Million and Admits Providing Flawed “Blue Sheet” Trading Data

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Scottrade with failing to provide the agency with complete and accurate information about trades done by the firm and its customers, which is commonly called "blue sheet" data.
SECScottrade, which is headquartered in St. Louis, agreed to settle the charges by paying a $2.5 million penalty and admitting it violated the recordkeeping provisions of the federal securities laws.

According to the SEC's order instituting settled administrative proceedings, broker-dealers like Scottrade are required upon request to electronically provide the SEC with blue sheet data so the agency can use it to identify and analyze trades in the course of investigations and other work. Blue sheets contain the details of each equity or options trade that is routed through clearing broker-dealers. The term "blue sheet" stems from the color of the forms originally mailed to broker-dealers to complete and return to the SEC. The process shifted to an electronic format in the 1980s.

"Blue sheet information is the lifeblood of many SEC investigations and examinations," said Andrew J. Ceresney, director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "When firms fail to provide us with accurate or complete trade data, it risks compromising our ability to detect and investigate securities law violations."

According to the SEC's order, the SEC staff sent electronic blue sheet requests to Scottrade in December 2011 in connection with an investigation the agency was conducting into suspicious trades made in a Scottrade online brokerage account that was the apparent victim of account intrusion. After receiving the blue sheet information, SEC staff discovered that Scottrade's submission was incomplete as it failed to include data from a number of trades that resulted from unauthorized account intrusions. After the SEC staff contacted Scottrade questioning the data, the firm informed the agency that a computer coding error had resulted in the inadvertent omission of the trades.

The SEC's order finds that Scottrade's computer coding error resulted in the omission of trades from blue sheet responses it made to the SEC from March 2006 to April 2012. During that time, Scottrade failed to provide the required blue sheet information on 1,231 occasions. Scottrade has corrected the deficient code responsible for its inaccurate and incomplete blue sheet responses.

"Scottrade's failure over six years to provide accurate and complete blue sheet trading data was egregious and violated its obligations under the securities laws," said Daniel M. Hawke, director of the SEC's Philadelphia Regional Office and chief of the Enforcement Division's Market Abuse Unit. "Firms need to ensure that that they comply with their blue sheet production obligations or, as in Scottrade's case, they will pay a heavy price if they fail to do so."

Scottrade admits the facts underlying the charges made in the SEC's order, which requires Scottrade to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 17a-4(j), 17a-25, and 17a-4(f)(3)(v). In addition to the $2.5 million penalty, Scottrade has agreed to undertake such remedial measures as retaining an independent consultant to review its supervisory, compliance, and other policies and procedures designed to detect and prevent securities laws violations related to blue sheet submissions.
Enhanced by Zemanta

College Professors Charged in Naked Short Selling Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission charged a pair of college professors in Tallahassee, Fla., with perpetrating a complex naked short selling scheme for more than $400,000 in illicit profits. Abusive naked short selling occurs when shares are sold without having the shares to deliver, and then intentionally failing to deliver the securities within the standard three-day settlement period.  

Seal of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commi...An SEC investigation found that Gonul Colak and Milen Kostov repeatedly engaged in a series of sham transactions designed to perpetuate a naked short position as part of an elaborate options trading strategy.  Colak and Kostov were required to deliver the securities underlying their short positions within the standard three days.  Instead, their sham reset transactions created the illusion that they had delivered the underlying securities when in fact they had taken no steps to do so.  They maintained the uncovered naked short positions and profited.

Colak and Kostov agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by paying more than $670,000.

Colak and Kostov used multiple brokerage accounts to disguise the spurious nature of the sham transactions, moving a short position from one brokerage firm to another every few days in order to spread the failures to deliver across multiple firms in an effort to avoid detection.  SEC investigators uncovered the complicated scheme while looking into unusual trading in one of the companies whose options were being traded by Colak and Kostov.  An SEC examiner separately noted Kostov’s large volume options trading in a different company.  By cross referencing their findings and crunching blue sheet data, it became clear that Colak and Kostov were likely trading with one another.  SEC investigators pieced together the complex trading strategy – which involved literally thousands of trades – by tracing one of the trading sequences from start to finish.

“Colak and Kostov engaged in trickery and deceit to avoid their delivery obligations and conceal their short selling scheme,” said Daniel M. Hawke, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit.  “No matter how complex the trading scheme, we are committed to exposing and halting abusive naked short selling and holding wrongdoers like Colak and Kostov accountable for their misconduct.”

According to the SEC’s order instituting settled administrative proceedings, Colak and Kostov set their scheme in motion in early 2010 and went on to sell more than $800 million worth of call options in more than 20 companies.  Their trading strategy involved purchasing and writing two pairs of options for the same underlying stock, and targeting options in hard-to-borrow securities in which the price of the put options was higher than the price of the call options.  Colak and Kostov profited by avoiding the cost of instituting and maintaining the short positions caused by their paired options trading.

The SEC’s order finds that Colak and Kostov violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rules 10b-5 and 10b-21 thereunder.  Colak agreed to pay $285,600 in disgorgement, $21,957 in prejudgment interest, and a $150,000 penalty.  Kostov agreed to pay $134,400 in disgorgement, $10,340 in prejudgment interest, and a penalty of $70,000.  Without admitting or denying the findings, Colak and Kostov agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing such violations.

For more information the Press Release is here. Need help with an SEC investigation? Call the attorneys at Sallah Astarita & Cox, LLC for a free telephone consultation - 212-509-6544.

Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta