Showing posts with label Examinations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Examinations. Show all posts

Thursday, November 5, 2015

FINRA’s Ketchum: 3 Top Exam Priorities for 2016

 Every year in the first quarter, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority publishes an annual letter about its regulatory and examination priorities to highlight emerging and existing risks that could affect investors and the integrity of the financial markets.
Logo
On Thursday FINRA Chairman and CEO Richard Ketchum offered a preview of the 2016 letter at the SIFMA/AICPA Financial Management Society Annual Conference held in New York when Ketchum said that FINRA’s exam focus will focus on three key issues: outsourcing, cyber risk and liquidity concerns.

Read the entire article at ThinkAdvisor: FINRA’s Ketchum: 3 Top Exam Priorities for 2016

Friday, August 14, 2015

Be Prepared - Clients Now Asking About Compliance Procedures

Everyone involved in the securities business knows that there has been a significant increase in compliance issues over recent years. I have seen  the increase in compliance requests made to our firm - to redraft procedures, review surveillance reports and processes and to conduct mock audits before FINRA and the SEC conduct their exams.

I still found it interesting that a recent survey conducted by the Wall Street Journal fournd that a significant number of securities professionals reported that prospective clients asked to review their firm's compliance policies or to interview compliance personnel.

The survey also found 63% of respondents saying they have a compliance committee at their firm, up from 48% in 2014—while 88% said they have conducted a compliance review in the last year, up from 67% in the prior year’s survey. Despite heightened awareness of compliance, only 53% said their firms were spending up to 5% of their total revenue on compliance. A summary of the survey's findings are available at the WSJ site. Thanks to Kevin Rosenberg for alerting us to the survey.

Monday, August 11, 2014

A Lesson in Broker-Dealer Examination Conduct

Everyone knows that examinations by the SEC or FINRA are not fun. Having examiners camped out in your office for days, or weeks at a time is disruptive. But do we all know that you cannot successfully hide problems?

Apparently not, because last week the SEC filed charges against a brokerage firm and its founder for allegedly violating net capital requirements and falsifying books and records to conceal the capital deficiencies.

Taking accounting liberties, like transferring liabilities to an affiliate, or treating an illiquid stock as an allowable asset, is bad enough. However, the SEC alleges that this firm provided SEC examiners with doctored invoices that sought to mask the extent of the firm’s liabilities.

 That resulted in additional charges, and criminal charges against the individual for obstructing the SEC’s examination.

 The better course of action? Obviously make sure that you don’t attempt to avoid discovery of your violations by taking a criminal course of action, but how about this. How about contacting a securities attorney and/or other securities professional, to help you discover, and address, the issue, before the SEC examiners discover it.

 In our years of representing financial firms, we have always found it has been better to identify the problem, identify a solution, and self-report if there is a violation. You will get a better result, and certainly better than criminal charges being filed for obstruction.

 If you think you have a net capital violation, or any rule violation, give me a call. We can assist you in not only identifying the problem, but in creating a solution. 212-509-6544.

  Related articles